The strongest arguments for metrication are economic and bipartisan, aren't 
they?

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 4, 2015, at 4:07 PM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
wrote:

>> From an outsider, if I may:
> 
> There is little hope that Chafee will get anywhere in his bid for US 
> President. BUT, he might well get some sort of position in a Clinton 
> administration, should she be successful. It seems to me that Chafee could 
> lay a lot of groundwork right now with Clinton regarding completing metric 
> conversion.
> 
> Just my two cents' worth.
> 
> John F-L
> 
> -----Original Message----- From: [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 7:45 PM
> To: U.S. Metric Association
> Subject: [USMA:54727] An Opportunity for the USMA (or Chafee Could Do a Lot 
> of Harm)
> 
> Paul (Trusten) -- A good response as always, Paul.  The advantage of
> Chaffee's statement is that it has drawn attention to the metric question
> once again.  BUT -- and it is a big BUT:
> 
> Chafee did an absolutely lousy job in rolling out his policy.  He claimed
> (briefly) that metrication would be a boost to international commerce, but
> he didn't give any argument for why that would be the case.  He could have
> talked about figures from the U.S. Metric Study (updated), he could have
> talked about improving STEM education to get our students jobs, he could
> have talked to the benefit to U.S. workers not having to buy two sets of
> tools, he could talked about greater markets for U.S. goods.  BUT -- he
> didn't.
> 
> Moreover, I would have hoped that he would mention that the U.S. is
> already half metric and is paying a high price for not pushing the
> conversion to completion, but remaining in limbo.  He could have educated
> people (briefly) about the fact that they are already metric in medicine,
> pharmaceuticals, alcohol, lighting, electricity, automotive, and many
> other areas.  American still remain ignorant of this fact.  BUT -- he
> didn't.
> 
> As a result, the press simply dredged up the old jokes against metric
> instead of discussing the issue as an economic and educational one.  I
> noted that one of the hosts on Fox News said that Chafee was "thousands of
> meters behind" in getting votes.  It is of interest that Fox News, the
> leading cable news company, is using meters more and more in its
> broadcasts.
> 
> It's going to be an uphill battle, but if we are to avoid metric being the
> butt of jokes instead of the way to the future economy, I strongly urge
> that you, Paul, or Dan, or someone of like metric knowledge and
> credentials, make a real effort to get through to Chafee, educate him on
> metric, and help him develop "talking points" for his speeches so that he
> won't sound like the -- sorry -- fool that he came across on television
> yesterday.
> 
> If Chafee continues to play the fool, the result will be that candidates
> back off any recommendation toward metric.  And you know that every one of
> the candidates in both parties will be asked the question -- if they
> haven't been already.  USMA needs to move fast.
> 
> My recommendation would be to downplay the metric law and emphasize jobs
> and commerce.  The U.S. needs a lot of education about this, but if we can
> get the message across that "Metric Means Jobs and Money" (how's that for
> a motto!), we might be able to move the debate to our side.
> 
> Martin Morrison
> "USMA Today" Training & Education Columnist
> 
> 
> 
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2015.0.5961 / Virus Database: 4355/9939 - Release Date: 06/04/15 

Reply via email to