That was not very clear. Let's use SI, the language of symbols: 100 m^2 is different than (100 m)^2, the latter 10 000 m^2.
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Stanislav Jakuba <[email protected]> wrote: > Martin, you mean 100 metres squared. Then it is 10 000 m2. > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 7:06 PM, John Dunlop <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Simply transposed... 100 square meters, vs 100 meters square. Simple >> mistake. >> >> John >> >> >> At 16:41 2016-10-28, [email protected] wrote: >> >> Please note that there was a typo in my "Metric Training & Education" >> column in the November-December issue of "Metric Today," in which a hectare >> was described as being 100 square meters rather than 10,000 square meters. >> This error was in the original source and escaped our proofreading. Don is >> going to publish an erratum in the next issue. --Martin Morrison >> _______________________________________________ USMA mailing list >> [email protected] https://lists.colostate.edu/cg >> i-bin/mailman/listinfo/usma </x-flowed> >> >> >> John Dunlop >> [email protected] personal email >> 612-374-2181 home phone >> >> _______________________________________________ >> USMA mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.colostate.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usma >> >> >
_______________________________________________ USMA mailing list [email protected] https://lists.colostate.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usma
