My response: Just to let everybody know I did respond to that silly article in the Wall Street Journal. If it will make anybody feel better, even Wilbur Ross, the US Secretary of Commerce, thought it was a silly and inaccurate article. I had to send my responses to the idiot author of the article in pieces using tweets since I saw no way to send the entire article. If someone has a way to send the entire thing to the editorial board at the Wall Street Journal, you have my permission to do so:
The car you drive is metric. The roads you drive on were built by metric bulldozers and metric road graders. If you ride the subway the gauge is standardized at 1,435 millimeters. Your photocopier is metric, as well as your cell phone. The Wall Street Journal is printed on presses that were built using metric units. When it is distributed electronically, the computers are metric. All the drugs you take and alcohol you drink are metric. US farmers sell their products overseas by the tonne, which is 1,000 kilograms or as heavy as one cubic meter of water. The Russians and Chinese went to the moon and beyond in SI metric units, and the Russians were first into space with Sputnik. Remember that Yuri Gargarin circled the globe in a metric space capsule. The fact is that the USA is already at least half metric, and it is easy to see why. For example: If you have a piece of lumber seven feet, three and one quarter inches long, and cut off a piece two feet, eight and nine sixteenths of an inch long, how much is left? Compare that to subtracting 1.82 meters of lumber from a board 3.45 meters long. Which calculation was easier? Do you see why buildings in metric countries go up much quicker and are less expensive than those built in the USA? The fact is that 95 percent of the people of the planet Earth have already “changed their culture” to adopt the SI metric system. There is simply no reason to believe Americans are not adaptable enough to be able to do the same. Mark Henschel <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Virus-free. www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 8:23 AM Peter Goodyear <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, everyone, > > Once again we have a writer attacking the metric system because it is > suited to modern science and technology and isn't the old-fashioned measure > used by our great grandfathers when they were tilling the soil. If it was a > critique by a metrologist, a surveyor, a scientist, – someone who has a > need to measure and calculate, – it might be worth seriously considering, > but not this piece. > It’s the usual stuff: tainted at birth by the French Revolutionary Terror; > replacing millennia of customary measurement; indivisible by three; gave > birth to the Industrial Revolution; took America to the Moon. The only new > thing I can see there is the name of the author, James Panero, a “writer, > editor and cultural critic,” according to his website. > > We've heard this too often before. This time it was published by the Wall > Street Journal on 20 May, World Metrology Day. > > The original article in The Wall Street Journal is only available to > subscribers, but I found it posted on the author's own website > <https://jamespanero.com/> where we are told: > > *James Panero* is an American writer, editor, and cultural critic. As the > Executive > Editor of *The New Criterion* > <https://www.newcriterion.com/author.cfm?authorid=16>, he writes on art > and culture monthly and serves as the magazine's gallery critic. > > I bet he’s never had to calculate anything more complicated than his bar > tab. > > I’ve posted it to Reddit, and comments, if any, will be here: > https://www.reddit.com/r/Metric/comments/bs2b4b/be_a_leader_not_a_liter_wall_street_journal/ > > Mr Panero's article is appended below. > > Best wishes, > > Peter Goodyear, > > Melbourne, Australia > e-mail: [email protected] <[email protected]> > > > > > *THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, May 20, 2019* > Be a Leader, Not a Liter > > Who needs the metric system, anyway? > > World Metrology Day is Monday. Forgive me if I don’t raise a pint—sorry, > 473 milliliters—in commemoration. This date is meant to celebrate the > International System of Units, otherwise known as the metric system. > Against pascals of pressure, the U.S. stands nearly alone in maintaining > its own “customary units” of weights and measures. We should stand tall on > our own 2 feet. The metric system has never measured up. It was customary > units that calibrated the machinery of the Industrial Revolution and took > us 240,000 miles to the moon. > > Proponents of the metric system have been metering out contempt since > their inhuman invention emerged from the French Revolution. In 1793 > France’s own customary units, including the pied du Roi (king’s foot), > fell victim to Jacobin Terror. The radicals standardized regional > differences and went the extra mile, rationalizing their measures through > the blinding logic of Enlightenment thought. > > The metric system became a symbol of modernity. More than overturning > millennia of custom, the meter also overturned man and his labor as the > basis of measurement. Nearly all customary units derive in some way from > use. The acre was the amount of land a yoke of oxen could till in a day. > The fathom is 6 feet, the span of the arms, useful when pulling up the > sounding line of a depth measure. The meter is unfathomable, calculated > (imprecisely) as a tiny fraction of the Earth’s circumference. > > Worse than the abandonment of human measure is the imposition of decimal > division. From calendars to clocks, French radicals went all in for 10. > That works well for abstract calculations, as with dollars and cents, but > not when measuring things in the real world. The Romans counted in 12s, as > in the hours on a clock and the inches in a foot. The Babylonians used 60, > from which we get minutes, seconds and degrees. A simple system of 8 still > exists in our ounces—and in computer bytes. Eight, 12 and 60 divide easily > into halves and quarters, even thirds, while a decimal system does not. A > third of a meter is roughly 33.33 centimeters, a third of a foot exactly 4 > inches. > > The abstract inhumanity of the metric system may be newly measured as new > bases are adopted to replace “Le Grand K,” a platinum cylinder kept locked > away in France that has been the kilogram standard. The metric kilogram > will now be determined through a new fixed agreement of Planck’s constant, > the length light travels in a vacuum in 1/299,792,458th of a second, and > the amount of time it takes a cesium-133 atom to vibrate 9,192,631,770 > times. It’s so simple! > > The U.S. has come close to compulsory metrication more than once. The > latest push came out of the 1970s, with metric textbooks, metric road > signs, and “The Metric Marvels,” a “Schoolhouse Rock” knockoff. President > Reagan ended the effort in 1982. > > With the European Union being cut down to size, can we hope for a return > to British imperial units, which the U.K. was forced to abandon after it > joined? A pint’s a pound, the world around, and it beats walking the Planck. > > > _______________________________________________ > USMA mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.colostate.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usma > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Virus-free. www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
_______________________________________________ USMA mailing list [email protected] https://lists.colostate.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usma
