EU law should go into effekt as soon as possible and apply to content and
aviation.
I förenta staterna, online Sales must display metric unités.


Den fre 25 okt. 2019 12:26Martin Vlietstra <[email protected]> skrev:

> Hi all,
>
>
>
> As I am not a US citizen, I cannot make a representation to the US
> authorities, but may I draw attention that the British Weights and Measures
> (Packaged Goods) Regulations 2006, Section 8(3) specifically prohibits any
> non-metric unit other than pounds, ounces, *imperial *gallons, quarts,
> pints and ounces (
> https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.legislation.gov.uk%2Fuksi%2F2006%2F659%2Fcontents%2Fmade&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cusma%40lists.colostate.edu%7C3cc568e3dfec42a3ebc208d759d40bf4%7Cafb58802ff7a4bb1ab21367ff2ecfc8b%7C0%7C0%7C637076639582750681&amp;sdata=6venI0MSGKEiKjZUuHZlzg6xf%2B81D3iGULgXEHWcxR4%3D&amp;reserved=0)
>  to be used on
> package labelling. The use of US gallons, quarts, pints or fluid ounces on
> the labels of alcoholic beverages might well render the product ineligible
> for export to the United Kingdom.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Martin Vlietstra
>
>
>
> *From:* USMA [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *John
> Steele
> *Sent:* 25 October 2019 01:30
> *To:* USMA List Server; [email protected]
> *Subject:* [USMA 1223] Re: Change in Liquor Labeling to Optional
> Non-metric?
>
>
>
> The rules for wine require metric net contents, but allow supplemental
> Customary at the moment (27 CFR 4.37b).  TTB says in the proposals it
> allows supplemental Customary on spirits and supplemental metric on beer,
> but the rules don't explicitly say it.  They would like to clarify.
>
>
>
> The rest of the proposal eliminates standard sizes and allows metric fill
> of any size for wine and spirits (any size Customary fill is currently
> allowed for beer.)
>
>
>
> I think the proliferation might get out of hand, but some of our standard
> sizes are not well coordinated with EU standard sizes (wines are better
> than spirits in this regard).  At least a few additional sizes for better
> coordination with the EU may make sense.  However, I'm not sure I care
> enough either way to submit comments.
>
>
>
> On Thursday, October 24, 2019, 6:39:49 PM EDT, [email protected] <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> In the November-December 2020 "Metric Today," which will be disseminated
>
> shortly by our USMA President, it is reported:
>
>
>
> "The US Department of the Treasury, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
>
> Bureau (ATTB) is seeking public comment regarding the elimination of
>
> certain standards of fill for wine and distilled spirits as well as the
>
> amendment of malt beverage net contents labeling regulation.  Under the
>
> proposals, wine and distilled spirits would require mandatory metric on
>
> all bottles and add optional US customary units."
>
>
>
> The change allows "optional US customary units" which are now prohibited.
>
> Did I get this right?  Shouldn't we be pushing back hard on this
>
> backsliding proposal?
>
>
>
> Unfortunately, public comment ends very soon, on October 30, 2019.  I have
>
> appended below the direct URL to get to the notice page.  Once there, you
>
> can click the COMMENT NOW! button to enter your comment against this
>
> backsliding.
>
>
>
> Notice 182 and 183:
>
>
> https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.regulations.gov%2FsearchResults%3Frpp%3D25%26po%3D0%26s%3Dnotice%252B182%26fp%3Dtrue%26ns%3Dtrue&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cusma%40lists.colostate.edu%7C3cc568e3dfec42a3ebc208d759d40bf4%7Cafb58802ff7a4bb1ab21367ff2ecfc8b%7C0%7C0%7C637076639582750681&amp;sdata=elhMpXDsz6jVsdtT6nSJ7ovxTpusVoiRNWKmhO7%2BbCo%3D&amp;reserved=0
>
>
>
> Could one of our knowledgeable writers could post here a brief template
>
> for a response that we each could modify for a personalized comment?.
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> USMA mailing list
>
> [email protected]
>
> https://lists.colostate.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usma
> _______________________________________________
> USMA mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.colostate.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usma
>
_______________________________________________
USMA mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.colostate.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usma

Reply via email to