https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.forbes.com%2Fsites%2Fmarshallshepherd%2F2021%2F11%2F08%2Fwhy-fahrenheit-is-better-for-conveying-climate-change-in-the-us%2F%3Fsh%3D7e6ee71286c0&data=04%7C01%7Cusma%40lists.colostate.edu%7C63862227e60242d6339808d9a3c74df5%7Cafb58802ff7a4bb1ab21367ff2ecfc8b%7C0%7C0%7C637720898808961766%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&sdata=hCYAV%2F8iRwNwhgqkBQYdH9xd5wOtEy3ajUtAquERvGI%3D&reserved=0 _______________________________________________ USMA mailing list [email protected] https://lists.colostate.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usma
I did a "Metric Today" column on this kind of retrograde thinking a year
or so ago. What is notable is how degrees Celsius have almost exclusively
taken over the discussion on this topic, to the point that you get the
occasional outlier who wants to convert the values to Fahrenheit to make
the differential seem bigger.
