On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 8:37 PM, Hans Hübner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Geo, > > did you test the patch with SBCL, too? > > Also, it would be helpful if you could leave the brace style and > indentation of the source code as it is. I agree that formatting > should be regular and correct, yet reformatting changes should not be > interleaved with functional changes as it makes reviewing a lot > harder. > > I can put the patch into my branch of the usocket repository once you > have verified that it does not break SBCL.
That would be great! Thanks, Erik. > -Hans > > On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Geo Carncross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> backend/sbcl.lisp doesn't appear to work at all with ECL. The attached >> patch (also available at: >> >> http://geocar.googlepages.com/usocket-ecl-3.diff >> >> ) makes build. >> >> What do I need to do in order to get it applied? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> usocket-devel mailing list >> usocket-devel@common-lisp.net >> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-devel >> >> > _______________________________________________ > usocket-devel mailing list > usocket-devel@common-lisp.net > http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-devel >
_______________________________________________ usocket-devel mailing list usocket-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-devel