On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 8:37 PM, Hans Hübner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Geo,
>
> did you test the patch with SBCL, too?
>
> Also, it would be helpful if you could leave the brace style and
> indentation of the source code as it is.  I agree that formatting
> should be regular and correct, yet reformatting changes should not be
> interleaved with functional changes as it makes reviewing a lot
> harder.
>
> I can put the patch into my branch of the usocket repository once you
> have verified that it does not break SBCL.

That would be great!

Thanks,


Erik.

> -Hans
>
> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Geo Carncross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> backend/sbcl.lisp doesn't appear to work at all with ECL. The attached
>> patch (also available at:
>>
>> http://geocar.googlepages.com/usocket-ecl-3.diff
>>
>> ) makes build.
>>
>> What do I need to do in order to get it applied?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> usocket-devel mailing list
>> usocket-devel@common-lisp.net
>> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-devel
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> usocket-devel mailing list
> usocket-devel@common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-devel
>
_______________________________________________
usocket-devel mailing list
usocket-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-devel

Reply via email to