在 2008-10-1，15:24， Leslie P. Polzer 写道：
So the libc6 statement would work for 99% of UNIX users
Unix or Linux? What statement would we need on Solaris/ *BSD?
I don't have boxes to check on, but I suppose libc6.so is pretty
safe for UNIX.
No. libc.so.6 just for Linux, I think it means the 6th big revision
(with incompatible API changes) of the GNU C Library.
On Solaris (I have some Solaris 10 (both SPARC and x86) boxes),
there's no libc.so.6 but libc.so.1:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/lib$ ls -l libc.so*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Aug 4 17:16 libc.so -> ../../
lib/libc.so.1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Aug 4 17:16 libc.so.1 -
> ../../lib/libc.so.1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/lib$ ldd /bin/ls
libsec.so.1 => /lib/libsec.so.1
libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1
libavl.so.1 => /lib/libavl.so.1
libm.so.2 => /lib/libm.so.2
/platform/SUNW,Ultra-80/lib/libc_psr.so.1
And on FreeBSD (which I don't have a running one), since they also do
not use GNU C Library either, it's quite possible that the libc.so
revision isn't "6" too.
But, on all UNIX, I think the file "/usr/lib/libc.so" will be the
right answer.
--
Chun Tian (binghe)
_______________________________________________
usocket-devel mailing list
usocket-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-devel
