0.4.x branch act the same as trunk. I don't see any different when
running hunchentoot.
(I don't have any real applications on hunchentoot)
On 2009-3-14, at 19:56, Hans Hübner wrote:
> Hi Binghe,
>
> thank you for testing, but what we need is someone who tests
> Hunchentoot with usocket 0.4.
>
> -Hans
>
> 2009/3/14 Chun Tian (binghe) <binghe.l...@gmail.com>:
>> Hi, Hans
>>
>> I just took a little time testing Hunchentoot 1.0 on SBCL (1.0.25)
>> and CCL
>> (1.3 RC1, 64-bit), both running on Mac OS X.
>>
>> It seems that Hunchentoot works well under usocket trunk, and all
>> hunchentoot tests except the ("Easy" handler example) has been
>> passed. I
>> believe the one not passed is a bug with Chunga, not usocket's fault.
>>
>> P.S. I'll continue working on the UDP branch from now on.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Chun Tian (binghe)
>>
>> On 2009-3-14, at 17:28, Hans Hübner wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 09:32, Erik Huelsmann <ehu...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Should I release 0.4.2?
>>>
>>> Before doing that, I'd like to know whether Hunchentoot 1.0 runs
>>> with
>>> it. I don't have the time to do that right now, so if anyone would
>>> like to volunteer, it'd be great. I'd be satisfied to see the
>>> Hunchentoot confidence test run successfully
>>> (http://weitz.de/hunchentoot/#testing) on SBCL and CCL.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Hans
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> usocket-devel mailing list
>>> usocket-devel@common-lisp.net
>>> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-devel
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
usocket-devel mailing list
usocket-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-devel
