On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 08:20, Elliott Slaughter <elliottslaugh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Wait -- what about the following? > * (usocket::get-hosts-by-name (usocket::get-host-name)) > (#(192 168 1 100) #(5 223 109 11) #(192 168 56 1)) > I know these functions aren't exported from usocket, but is there any reason > why they couldn't be?
Is USOCKET::GET-HOSTS-BY-NAME implemented by all backends? See my previous post about the lack of robustness of hostname based solutions. -Hans _______________________________________________ usocket-devel mailing list usocket-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-devel
