Hi, Juano

Thanks, your patch has been merged into usocket.  I didn't know that packages 
like XXX-SYSTEM are not needed any more, and you're right that the logical 
pathname definition was never used by other usocket code.

These changes (with others) will appear in next release 0.5.4, which should be 
released on mid September.

Regards,

Chun Tian (binghe)

在 2011-8-26,17:42, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll 写道:

> There are various things in how the usocket library is packaged that prevent 
> it from being used in standalone programs with ECL. I summarize them
> 
> - A package usocket-system is defined and used in package.lisp. This package 
> is not needed, as ASDF provides it and when the executable is created it does 
> not exist.
> 
> - Standalone executables do not have ASDF in it. There is no need. Yet 
> usocket uses it to define a logical hostname which is never used.
> 
> - The references to usocket-system propagate to usocket-test.
> 
> I attach a patch against the version that quicklisp distributes. With this 
> patch usocket builds as an independent library without problems and can be 
> shipped in standalone executables as well.
> 
> Juano
> 
> -- 
> Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC
> c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain) 
> http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com
> <patches.diff>_______________________________________________
> usocket-devel mailing list
> usocket-devel@common-lisp.net
> http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-devel

_______________________________________________
usocket-devel mailing list
usocket-devel@common-lisp.net
http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-devel

Reply via email to