Hi Jan Thanks for your suggestion, the feature for :tcp-no-delay will be added soon and easily. I think at least CLISP/SBCL/Allegro/Clozure/LispWorks will be supported first, rest platforms may need some more investigations. The only thing I haven't decided, is to use :TCP-NO-DELAY or just :NO-DELAY for the option name, depend on related exist feature provided by CLISP.
Regards, Chun Tian (binghe) Il giorno 13/feb/2013, alle ore 22:35, Jan Moringen <jmori...@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de> ha scritto: > Hi, > > I like the new socket-option functions and I think methods > > socket-option (stream-usocket (eql :tcp-no-delay)) > (setf socket-option) (t stream-usocket (eql :tcp-no-delay)) > > should be added. > > This addition would enable stream sockets obtained from socket-accept to > operate with TCP_NODELAY. As far as I can see, this is currently not > possible without unportable code like > > (setf (sb-bsd-sockets::sockopt-tcp-nodelay (usocket::socket s)) t) > > What do you think? > > Kind regards, > Jan > > > _______________________________________________ > usocket-devel mailing list > usocket-devel@common-lisp.net > http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-devel _______________________________________________ usocket-devel mailing list usocket-devel@common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-devel
