Hi again, Thanks for clarifications. I'll analyze your patch deeply, to see if other backends could learn something from your CCL work.
--binghe On 2013-04-17, at 16:00, Faré <fah...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Chun Tian (binghe) > <binghe.l...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Faré >> >> Thank you very much. I've merged your latest patch, and I guess it's a >> combination of your previous two patch mails, right? >> > Yes, a combination of the two previous patches, > plus a third patch we use at work that I had previously failed to send > (signal vs error). > >> I'm a little busy (on commercial Lisp projects) these months, therefore I'm >> so sorry to usocket users that some bugs and feature requests cannot be >> handle quickly. I'll hurry up from today and resolve all pending work >> before the end of this month and make a new release. (On the other side, if >> any one want to maintain usocket together with me, it's more than welcome. >> However, I myself do have some long-term dev plans, just haven't got time to >> implement …) >> > Looking forward to the results! > > —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org > The main reason Santa is so jolly is because > he knows where all the bad girls live.
