On 07/15/2017 10:33 PM, Jacob Gilbert wrote:
> The only guarantee is that samples that arrive after the tag will be after the comman has been issued. This has not been my experience, particularly at lower sample rates. As far as I can tell, the code path responsible for tagging never actually goes to the USRP device at all, when a retune is issued, a flag is set in the work function that causes a tag to be emitted on the next call (https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/blob/master/gr-uhd/lib/usrp_source_impl.cc#L645).
_tag_now is set *after* the command is already "in flight". Note I just said "issued", NOT "completed".


> The control-plane an data-plane run asynchronously to one another.

This does not appear to be strictly true, as timed commands exist. It more seems like this is just a feature that is not implemented yet. It should certainly be possible within the current UHD paradigm since timing metadata certainly runs synchronous to the data-plane as it propagates downstream.
For the most part, it is true. With the exception of commands that directly alter streaming, control commands (tuning, gain setting, etc) are conceptually asynchronous to each other in the FPGA. In fact, the FPGA has no *concept* of "gain", or "frequency", or any of a number of other radio-hardware operating parameters. The "model" is that the FPGA exposes I2C and SPI buses so that the host can manipulate registers on the radio hardware in use, but the actual *meaning* of those commands is completely opaque to the FPGA (and hence things like frequency tags). Timed commands make it seem more "synchronous", but the architecture of the FPGA in general makes no linkage between the data stream, and the radio hardware control stream.



Jacob


On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    On 07/14/2017 04:22 PM, Eugene Grayver wrote:

    Yes, I definitely agree that there’s no way to tell when the
    tuning is DONE.  However, my question was about the ‘shortly
    after’ part.  Should it not be inserted ‘shortly before’, or
    ‘exactly at’?  Since there’s typically no way to look into the
    future, (yes, of course it is doable), there’s no way for
    somebody to know that the samples that are before the tag are
    actually ‘invalid.’

    _______________________
    Eugene Grayver, Ph.D.
    Aerospace Corp., Sr. Eng. Spec.
    Tel: 310.336.1274 <tel:%28310%29%20336-1274>
    ________________________

    The control-plane an data-plane run asynchronously to one
    another.   The only guarantee is that samples that arrive after
    the tag will be after the comman has been issued.


    *From:*[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    [mailto:[email protected]]
    *Sent:* Friday, July 14, 2017 12:34 PM
    *To:* Eugene Grayver <[email protected]>
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Cc:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Subject:* Re: [USRP-users] TwinRX tuning timing

    The frequency tag is inserted at some point shortly after the
    command-set is issued to the hardware.  There's no way for the
    various bits and pieces to tell when the underlying (mostly
    analog) hardware has converged to an "acceptable" steady-state
    operating mode.  PLL synthesizers don't instantly switch from one
    frequency to another, digital (and analog) filters have group
    delays, etc.

    The time to achieve steady-state can vary from hardware-type to
    hardware-type, ambient temperature, size of the frequency step, etc.

    On 2017-07-14 15:10, Eugene Grayver via USRP-users wrote:

        I am running some experiments to understand the timing of
        TwinRX tuning.  A very simple experiment shows that the tag
        indicating a frequency change is not placed at the right
        sample.  Here’s a capture: The dashed line indicates the tag
        sample number.  However, there’s clearly something happening
        before the tag.  Note that I am not using timed commands for
        this – just a regular tune request.

        _______________________
        Eugene Grayver, Ph.D.
        Aerospace Corp., Sr. Eng. Spec.
        Tel: 310.336.1274 <tel:%28310%29%20336-1274>
        ________________________

        _______________________________________________
        USRP-users mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
        <http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com>



    _______________________________________________
    USRP-users mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
    <http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com>



_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Reply via email to