Hello Juan, Right now RFNoC development requires Vivado 2015.4 and the rfnoc-devel branch. We are in the process of updating the rfnoc-devel branch to include the changes from the master branch, including Vivado 2017.4 support.
Regards, Derek On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 4:33 AM, Juan Francisco via USRP-users < [email protected]> wrote: > Ok.... is there any way to build for rfnoc-devel using Vivado 2017.4 then? > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:22 PM, Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On 03/26/2018 11:15 PM, Juan Francisco via USRP-users wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am starting a new RFNoC design with custom RFNoC FPGA blocks, and I am >>> a bit confused as to whether I should use UHD 3.11 or the rfnoc-devel >>> branch. I'd like to be able to build using Vivado 2017.4, which seems to >>> be the default for 3.11, but the rfnoc-devel branch is still stuck on >>> 2015.4. >>> >>> Is UHD 3.11 fully RFNoC compatible, or do I need to stick with >>> rfnoc-devel to get all the necessary features? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Juan >>> >>> >>> rfnoc-devel is still the branch you should use for now, although there >> will be fixes coming to 3.11 soon I think that will make it OK for RFNOC >> developers. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> USRP-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com >> > > > _______________________________________________ > USRP-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com > >
_______________________________________________ USRP-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
