Hello Louis: Thanks for the detailed feedback. We have reproduced this issue, and are debugging it now. We will get back to you and post an update shortly.
--​Neel Pandeya On 12 April 2018 at 18:46, Louis Brown via USRP-users < usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: > Could it be something to do with this commit for address offsets? > > https://github.com/EttusResearch/uhd/commit/8ee22529f33a63c2064b0dc6fbcc04 > c2ded94b4a > > Lou > > > On Apr 12, 2018, at 16:38, Louis Brown <rfeng...@me.com> wrote: > > > Did something change with respect to daughter board addressing in UHD 3.11? > I have an X310 with LFTX and LFRX in motherboard slot A. > When I run benchmark_rate it core dumps as follows: > > /* > [/usr/local/lib64/uhd/examples]$ ./benchmark_rate --args > "addr=192.168.40.2" --tx_rate=10E6 > > [INFO] [UHD] linux; GNU C++ version 7.3.1 20180303 (Red Hat 7.3.1-5); > Boost_106400; UHD_3.11.0.1-0-unknown > [00:00:00.000006] Creating the usrp device with: addr=192.168.40.2... > [INFO] [X300] X300 initialization sequence... > [INFO] [X300] Determining maximum frame size... > [INFO] [X300] Maximum frame size: 8000 bytes. > [INFO] [X300] Setup basic communication... > [INFO] [X300] Loading values from EEPROM... > [INFO] [X300] Setup RF frontend clocking... > [INFO] [X300] Radio 1x clock:200 > [INFO] [RFNOC DMA FIFO] Running BIST for FIFO 0... > [INFO] [RFNOC DMA FIFO] BIST passed (Throughput: 1299 MB/s) > [INFO] [RFNOC DMA FIFO] Running BIST for FIFO 1... > [INFO] [RFNOC DMA FIFO] BIST passed (Throughput: 1302 MB/s) > [WARNING] [RFNOC] [0/Radio_0] defines 2 input buffer sizes, but 1 input > ports > [INFO] [RFNOC RADIO] Register loopback test passed > [INFO] [RFNOC RADIO] Register loopback test passed > [WARNING] [RFNOC] [0/Radio_1] defines 2 input buffer sizes, but 1 input > ports > [INFO] [RFNOC RADIO] Register loopback test passed > [INFO] [RFNOC RADIO] Register loopback test passed > [INFO] [CORES] Performing timer loopback test... > [INFO] [CORES] Timer loopback test passed > [INFO] [CORES] Performing timer loopback test... > [INFO] [CORES] Timer loopback test passed > Using Device: Single USRP: > Device: X-Series Device > Mboard 0: X310 > RX Channel: 0 > RX DSP: 0 > RX Dboard: A > RX Subdev: LFRX (AB) > RX Channel: 1 > RX DSP: 0 > RX Dboard: B > RX Subdev: Unknown (0xffff) - 0 > TX Channel: 0 > TX DSP: 0 > TX Dboard: A > TX Subdev: LFTX (AB) > TX Channel: 1 > TX DSP: 0 > TX Dboard: B > TX Subdev: Unknown (0xffff) - 0 > > [00:00:02.623786] Setting device timestamp to 0... > terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::out_of_range' > what(): map::at > Aborted (core dumped) > */ > > > If I specify tx_channels "1" it runs, lighting up the slot B TX/RX LED, or > course I have no boards installed there. > > /* > [/usr/local/lib64/uhd/examples]$ ./benchmark_rate --args > "addr=192.168.40.2" --tx_rate=100E6 --tx_channels "1" > */ > > If I specify tx_channels "0" it core dumps with the same std::out_of_range > > Flow graphs that ran in UHD 3.10 with sub-device "A:AB" no longer run: > > /* > [INFO] [CORES] Timer loopback test passed > terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::out_of_range' > what(): map::at > */ > > If I try benchmark_rate with another X310 with the UBX card in slot A, > things work fine. So maybe it's specific to the use of LF cards with UHD > 3.11. > > Thanks, > Lou > > > > > _______________________________________________ > USRP-users mailing list > USRP-users@lists.ettus.com > http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com > >
_______________________________________________ USRP-users mailing list USRP-users@lists.ettus.com http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
