Hi Martin,
Thank you. Please find the log files in each case in the attachment. They
look very similar to me.
Sorry for the late reply. I lost your email some how..

Thanks.
Tien

On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 7:45 PM, Martin Braun via USRP-users <
[email protected]> wrote:

> On 03/15/2018 08:15 PM, Dang tien Vo-Huu via USRP-users wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > Recently I have some doubt about the difference between USRP Sink/Source
> > and the RFNoC Radio TX/RX. I found the answer in the knowledge
> > base https://kb.ettus.com/RFNoC but when I tried the RFNoC TX and RX
> > flow together, it didn't seem to be equivalent to the USRP Sink and
> > Source together: the RFNoC flow threw many "U" while the USRP
> > Sink/Source flow ran without any warning.
> >
> > The USRP Sink/Source flow graph is very simple, it has 2 flows:
> > Noise Source --> USRP Sink
> > USRP Source --> Null Sink
> >
> > The RFNoC flow graph:
> > Noise Source --> RFNoC DmaFIFO --> RFNoC DUC --> RFNoC Radio TX
> > RFNoC Radio RX --> RFNoC DDC --> Null Sink
> >
> > And here is what I received when run RFNoC flow graph:
> > tienvh@gl502vm:~/workspace/rfnoc/src/rfnoc-tutorial/examples$
> > ./rfnoc_tx.py -f 3000M -g 30 -s 20M
> > [INFO] [UHDlinux; GNU C++ version 5.4.1 20160904; Boost_105800;
> > UHD_4.0.0.rfnoc-devel-409-gec9138eb]
> > [INFO] [X300] X300 initialization sequence...
> > [...]
> > Press Enter to quit:
> > UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
> UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
> UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
> UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
> UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
> >
> >
> > I did the comparison by building an image with 2 DDC and 2 DUC so that I
> > can run both RFNoC flow and legacy flow. I'm using USRP X310 with UBX
> > and the UHD version is UHD_4.0.0.rfnoc-devel-409-gec9138eb
> >
> > Has anyone seen this before or has an intuition on this?
> > I also attach the flow graphs for more detail.
>
> This is not the expected outcome. Can you run with UHD_LOG_LEVEL=debug
> and paste it? Maybe the DUC isn't getting programmed correctly.
>
> -- M
>
> _______________________________________________
> USRP-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>

Attachment: log_legacy
Description: Binary data

Attachment: log_rfnoc
Description: Binary data

_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Reply via email to