Marcus,

Understood, thanks the response. Hope you feel better soon.

-Daniel

On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 1:37 PM Marcus D. Leech <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On 12/27/2018 01:51 PM, Daniel May wrote:
>
> Marcus,
>
> Thanks for the response. We've tried creating two separate multi_usrp
> objects, but haven't had much luck. Is there an example somewhere of using
> two multi_usrp objects with a single X310?
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>
> Actually, I may have mis-spoken.   The case I was thinking of was the
> multi-USRP case.
>
> You'll probably have to resample one of your streams.
>
> Currently struggling with the flu.  It has addled my brain...
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 10:56 AM Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 12/27/2018 10:57 AM, Daniel May via USRP-users wrote:
>> > We have an X310 with two UBX-160 daughter cards. Is it possible to set
>> > different sample rates for each Tx channel? Seems that setting the
>> > sample rate for one channel sets all channels. We're controlling
>> > things via a multi_usrp object. The set_tx_rate function has a channel
>> > argument, but it doesn't seem to do anything.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Daniel
>> >
>> >
>> By definition a multi_usrp object is a conceptual "synchronization
>> domain", which requires the same sample rate across all channels.
>>
>> If you need different rates, use different multi_usrp objects.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> USRP-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Reply via email to