To answer my own question:
https://github.com/EttusResearch/uhd/blob/master/CHANGELOG#L226

it seems the answer is yes.

--
Piotr Krysik
W dniu 03.04.2019 o 12:34, Piotr Krysik via USRP-users pisze:
> Hi,
>
> W dniu 03.04.2019 o 12:15, Fabian Schwartau via USRP-users pisze:
>> (...)
>> Keep in mind that it is not necessary to use LO-sharing to get a well
>> defined phase relation between the channels. Depending on your
>> frequency and bandwidth settings, it is possible to also achive this,
>> as all LOs are driven from a common 200 MHz reference clock.
>>
> Do you mean TwinRXes might have similar initial phase reset capability
> that UBXes and SBXes have?
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Piotr Krysik
>
>
>> Best regards,
>> Fabian
>>
>> Am 03.04.2019 um 12:05 schrieb Piotr Krysik via USRP-users:
>>> Hi Fabian,
>>>
>>> W dniu 03.04.2019 o 11:05, Fabian Schwartau via USRP-users pisze:
>>>> Hi Piotr,
>>>>
>>>> we once had a very similar issue. But we also saw this on the same
>>>> frequency when switching between frequencies. Can you try this as
>>>> well? Just switch forth and back between two frequencies and just plot
>>>> one of them?
>>> I'm not sure I understand correctly what you mean. You mean that the
>>> result for a given frequency was not stable in your case across many
>>> measurements? In our case this situation was repeating, but the
>>> application doing the recording was restarted for each measurement.
>>>
>>>> As far as I remember the issue was because we were not using the
>>>> LO-Sharing. We were able to get everything running by using a C++
>>>> application and not gnuradio (I can see you are using python - which
>>>> is basically the same). There was a bug in gnuradio/python causing
>>>> this issue.
>>>> You can try to remove one of the LO-sharing cables while doing a
>>>> measurement and see if the phase suddenly starts to do crazy things
>>>> (the signal should also be lost). If that is not the case, you are not
>>>> actually using LO-sharing.
>>>>
>>> Do you know what this bug was exactly? GNU Radio didn't configure
>>> LO-Sharing the way it was specified?
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Piotr Krysik


_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Reply via email to