Dear Marcus, Thanks very much for letting me know. I had figured this would be the case but wanted to confirm before considering some other options.
Take care, Manav On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 5:43 PM Marcus D Leech <[email protected]> wrote: > That’s not likely to work. Given the different internal architectures of > the two devices and different clicking schemes. > > For one the DDC architecture is different leading to different effective > group delays. > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Jan 19, 2021, at 12:33 PM, Manav Kohli via USRP-users < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Dear USRP mailing list, > > > > Hope everyone is well. I have a GNU radio flowgraph with a USRP N210 and > USRP X310 synchronized with the Octoclock. When starting the flowgraph, I > can see a random sample offset between the N210 and X310. As the two radios > are synchronized, the sample offset does not change for the duration of > running the flowgraph, but it is random every time the flowgraph is > started. This is not amenable to the time slotted system I am trying to > work on. > > > > I am aware that the X310 and N210 may not be simultaneously used in a > USRP Sink or USRP Source block (or in UHD, in a multi_usrp object). With > this in mind, is it even possible to guarantee that the X310 and N210 have > the same startup time, namely that they begin transmitting and receiving at > exactly the same time? > > > > Thank you very much! > > Manav > > _______________________________________________ > > USRP-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com >
_______________________________________________ USRP-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
