yes, you are correct about the HA vs XA (although i haven't tried XA yet). Also, yes the image type shouldn't have any effect on the patch as the patch is for gr-ettus which doesn't have anything to do with the image itself, just how it's initialized. The HA (or in your case XA) image needs to be synthesized using a vivado license and the rfnoc_image_builder since Ettus doesn't include that in the UHD source. If you want to build an XA image, i guess you can just use: default_target: 'X310_XA' that should tell the image builder to pull together a 10G links Ethernet link and an Aurora link.
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 3:57 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry I see that the HA just indicates the image built for 1G. We intend > to use 10G (XA), but I doubt that this has any effect on the patch. > _______________________________________________ > USRP-users mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ USRP-users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
