I received a single ‘L’ and the code again fails with the LATE error with a single e320 (in the same fashion as with two e320’s).
From: Marcus D. Leech <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2022 1:53 PM To: Caffrey, Michael Paul <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: [USRP-users] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: sychronous receiving from multiple e320's repeatedly results in ERROR_CODE_LATE_COMMAND On 2022-04-27 15:31, Caffrey, Michael Paul wrote: I can run the program over and over again from the command line of the host without rebooting / resetting the host or the e320’s. Each time I run the program, the first collects succeeds ( I receive the requested amount of data, anyway), while subsequent receives in the loop of the program do not receive data and generate the LATE error. From: Marcus D. Leech <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2022 1:27 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [USRP-users] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: sychronous receiving from multiple e320's repeatedly results in ERROR_CODE_LATE_COMMAND On 2022-04-27 15:13, Caffrey, Michael Paul via USRP-users wrote: That is a good question and I should have included that I can run the program over and over and the 1st attempt always succeeds and subsequent fail. I do not reboot or reset the e320’s in any way outside of the python example. OK, so how is "first time" defined? First time after rebooting your computer? First time after rebooting the E320? You run the program once and it never succeeds again, no matter what you do? I want to understand what the boundary condition is that causes it to start working again... Do you only get the "LLL" and timeouts when using multiple E320s, or does this code fail with a single device as well?
_______________________________________________ USRP-users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
