Marcus D. Leech wrote:

> On 2022-09-08 04:54, Aiden Morrison via USRP-users wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am attempting to do synchronized multi-site reception using USRP
> > N210 radios. Our first attempt was to make use of 2x radios with ettus
> > GPSDO modules installed, feeding the radios with a common PRN sequence
> > and correlating the outputs to evaluate timing offset. The Ettus GPSDO
> > radios say they provide +/-60ns timing accuracy, so even in the worst
> > case where one of the radios goes to each side of the limit, at 10 MHz
> > we would have slightly more than 1 sample of offset between them, but
> > in testing we observed +0 to +3 samples of offset.
> >
> > To isolate the problem we repeated the test with two different N210
> > radios fed by a common external 10 MHz and PPS signal from a GNSS
> > disciplined Rubidium source, and observed exactly the same +0 to +3
> > samples of shift between the captured sequences. Seeing the same error
> > when using a common clock indicates the problem is very likely to be
> > in our test software.
> >
> > In our software we follow
> > https://files.ettus.com/manual/page_sync.html for synchronization:
> >
> > 1. We create two USRP objects, one for each radio.
> > 2. We command the USRPs to use the external synchronization (radios
> >    report back that they are synchronized to the GPSDO in the former
> >    configuration)
> > 3. We use a common time in the time spec commands for each
> >    configuration change (e.g. setting LO frequencies)
> > 4. For each burst capture of 50,000 samples we set a time_spec for
> >    each USRP a long time in the future (1.0 seconds since the last
> >    capture)
> > 5. Step 4 is repeated 1000 times giving us 1000 bursts for evaluating
> >    the synchronization
> >
> > The only factor I can see is that we are using WBX radio modules, and
> > we are uncertain if this is somehow a factor in what we are seeing.
> >
> > Thanks in advance for feedback.
> >
> > \-Aiden
> >
> > ---

Hello,

Aiden was talking about time offset not phase offset. WBX phase ambiguity is 
important information but a bit off-topic. 

As far as I remember GPS synchronization for N2x0, the numbers from Ettus specs 
are a bit optimistic.

It seemed what they are putting there is standard deviation of the time 
difference not max/min. Then it would make sense.

But I didn’t try to synchronize N2x0’s for some time (many years) so I’m not 
sure. Maybe something changed.

Best Regards,\
Piotr Krysik
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to