On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 8:35 PM Marcus D. Leech <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 16/05/2023 20:31, Michael Toussaint wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am testing the LO synching on a single N321 using the 2 Tx channels
> > on the N321.
> >
> > I have followed the LO setup steps from the knowledge base,
> > https://kb.ettus.com/USRP_N320/N321_LO_Distribution, to distribute the
> > LO. (Sample Python code used for setup below)
> >
> > I am using separate streamers for each Tx channel and noticing a delay
> > between the 2 channels executing.
> Yeah, using separate streamers, the code doesn't attempt synchronization
> across two streamers.  You'll need a single
>    two-channel streamer--that's the "synchronization paradigm" that has
> been in UHD for over a decade...

Separate streamers shouldn't be a problem. I use them regularly in
synchronized mode.  If both streamers have the same time spec, the
radio should start them both in sync. That said, it won't hurt to test
with a single streamer.

> > The Tx channels do not appear to be synchronized, we're measuring
> > anywhere from 0.5ns to 4ns of delay across the channels.

The master clock cycle on the N321 is between 4 and 5 ns.  This is
also the D/A (and A/D) clock cycle.  When you are seeing a relative
delay of 0.5ns this is about one tenth of a D/A sample interval.  Or,
from another perspective, this represents a difference of about 4
inches of cable length (if the relative delay had an analog cause).
So, the channels are definitely synchronized to some degree - I don't
have a guess at why the synchronization is not tighter.
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to