On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 4:01 AM Marcus D. Leech <patchvonbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 14/08/2024 03:52, Brajesh wrote: > > > > That's great. > If possible, request your time for interactive session. This request is to > understand codebase ( > https://github.com/EttusResearch/fpga/commit/78eab419fdcdc18f4da8fd33f267af6c4d0494f6 > ) and get starting point to start for data rate modifications. > > You should go through the official support channels--the e-mail you got > from "supp...@ettus.com" <supp...@ettus.com> will have given you a URL. > > But unless you've purchased a higher-level support package, you aren't > going to get an engineer to sit down with you and > tell you where to put modified code, and how that code is best > structured, etc. > > Every new purchase includes a "initial bringup" level of support, which > absolutely DOES NOT include detailed hand-holding > through modifying the FPGA code. > > Even if you *could* get that level of support, I would *NOT* be the person > doing it. I didn't write that FPGA code, and I'm > not primarily an FPGA developer. > I understand these clauses of support especially for academia. But still thank you for clarifying. > >> I'm not sure what you're looking for apart from what you've already >> found, and I've already pointed you to. The FPGA source-code >> is freely available. There are documents that describe the work-flow >> for making custom mods to the N2xx FPGA images. >> The FPGA "architecture" is common between (obsolete) USRP2 and N2xx >> hardware. The follow-on architecture is referred >> to in the FPGA codebase as "usrp3", but that's just the naming of the >> FPGA architecture. >> >> Like I have said previously, there is no "structured walk-through" >> document that describes, in a high-level way, the architecture >> of the FPGA codebase. The codebase is the document. The same is >> basically true for the host-side UHD library. The architecture >> changes often-enough that by the time a "structured walk-through" >> document could be considered "complete", the architecture >> underneath it, at least the details, would have changed. Such is the >> nature of an evolving code-base. >> >> Now, for the "usrp2" FPGA architecture, THAT codebase has been relatively >> static for many years. But a goodly chunk of it >> was written by people who have long-since departed the company. >> Occasional maintenance is done on it, but for the >> most part, it has been the same for many years. Again, though, the >> codebase IS the documentation. >> >> > Thanks again for shared details. > > >
_______________________________________________ USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com