On 2025-05-24 16:42, Nikos Balkanas wrote:
Spectrum looks much nicer at the expense of less accurate tuning.
There is still some LO leakage...
I have my offset at sr/2 +20e6. maybe I need more.
I always just set my offset, when I use it at all, to Fs/1.8 or
thereabouts. This moves the LO leakage
a little bit out-of-band.
On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 10:57 PM Nikos Balkanas <nbalka...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Ty very much,
That worked.It converged in just 2 loops:)
I thought I was linking sensor to sensor, and lo_locked was
updating in real time:(
But this was a sensor_value_handle, not a sensor:(
BR
Nikos
On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 9:44 PM Marcus D. Leech
<patchvonbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2025-05-24 14:35, Nikos Balkanas wrote:
> uhd_usrp_get_rx_sensor(dev[channel], "lo_locked", channel,
&lo_locked)))
You need to repeatedly call this in your while loop.
All you're doing is getting the sensor value once, immediately
after
tuning, and then spinning on the value of the "value_to_bool"
conversion, which
will never change, because you aren't getting a fresh value
of the
sensor.
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com
