Hey Rob,

thanks for getting back to us on the resolution. Yeah, we have seen issues
with different (Q)SFP modules over the years -- not all work with USRPs.

--M

On Sat, Jun 21, 2025 at 12:22 AM Rob Kossler via USRP-users <
usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:

> Update.  The optical transceiver model that I was using is labeled
> "QSFP-CWDM4-100G".  I also have some older models "QSFP28-IR4-100G" which I
> believe are the same item (just with the model renamed at some point). In
> any case, if I use the IR4 model in the X410 with either the IR4 or the
> CWDM4 model in the workstation E810 NIC, it now works!  So, the fact that
> the 2 different model names can talk to each other must imply that the
> technology (CWDM x4) is the same.  And, the fact that the X410 is happy
> with the IR4 model means that it can handle this technology.  I don't
> really have an explanation why the CWDM4 model does not work in the X410.
> Rob
>
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 4:19 PM Rob Kossler <rkoss...@nd.edu> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I just received an X410 and I am having trouble getting the 100Gb link to
>> work.
>>
>>    - On the workstation side, my NIC is an Intel E810 CQDA2 and I am
>>    using UHD-4.8 with Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
>>    - On the X410 side, I loaded the  UHD-4.8 file system and the UC_200
>>    FPGA image which implements 100Gb on SFP1.
>>    - Finally, I am using Fiberstore CWDM4 100Gb
>>    <https://www.fs.com/products/65219.html?now_cid=1159> optical
>>    transceivers with a duplex single-mode fiber.  This item is my current
>>    suspected culprit - it's not clear to me whether the operation of this
>>    optical transceiver is transparent to the 100Gb port or if the port needs
>>    to handle things differently for this type of CWDM transceiver
>>
>> The problem is that I never even get link lights on the workstation NIC
>> when I connect to the X410. However, if I move the QSFP28 transceiver from
>> the X410 to another workstation (with a Mellanox 100Gb NIC), the link
>> lights come right up on both sides and the OS sees a 100Gb Ethernet link.
>>
>> So, the problem "appears" to be that the X410 does not like this optical
>> transceiver. Does anyone have any experience using this optical transceiver
>> with the X410?
>>
>> Thanks.
>> Rob
>>
> _______________________________________________
> USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
> To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com
>
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com

Reply via email to