Johannes Merkle wrote on 19.03.2014 17:34:
> Yaron, Ralf,
> 
> shouldn't draft-sheffer-tls-bcp-02 also give recommendations for clients on 
> signaling minimum required hash functions
> via the signature algorithm extensions?
> 

maybe my post has been overlooked... Or is there simply no interest in this 
aspect?
Shouldn't a BCP for TLS include an option to avoid SHA-1 in digital signatures.



-- 
Johannes

_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta

Reply via email to