Hi Orit & everyone,
I think this documents look fine. I have a comment that I suggest be
addressed in the text.
The httpbis working group has at least been toying with the idea of
requiring TLS 1.2 for HTTP2. I don't know the state of that. Still, I
suggest the inclusion of text in draft-ietf-uta-tls-bcp along the
following lines:
These are minimum recommendations for the general use of TLS.
Individual specifications may have stricter requirements either in
regard to cypher suites or TLS version, based on their particular
circumstances. When that is the case, implementers MUST adhere to
those stricter requirements.
Eliot
On 5/22/14, 9:02 PM, Orit Levin (LCA) wrote:
>
> So far, there has been almost no discussion on the three UTA drafts:
> draft-ietf-uta-tls-attacks, draft-ietf-uta-tls-bcp, and
> draft-ietf-uta-xmpp. Based on that, do people think that these drafts
> are ready for the last call?
>
>
>
> Reading the notes from London
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/89/minutes/minutes-89-uta , a number
> of participants were planning / suggesting providing additions and/or
> clarifications on a number of points, but no major concerns have been
> raised. The list of people with action items ;-) include Aaron Kaplan,
> Daniel Kahn Gillmor, Kohei Kasamatsu, Chris Newman, and Yoav Nir.
>
>
>
> All, please, read the drafts and post your comments on the list.
> Subject to comments (or the lack of them) we are planning to announce
> last call on each of the three drafts in a matter of days or a few weeks.
>
>
>
> Leif and Orit, the chairs.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Uta mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
