On 12/01/2014 09:33 PM, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet wrote:
> 
>    o There are no protocol mechanisms to negotiate the DH groups or
>      parameter lengths supported by client and server.

Well, it's not finished with standardization or deployment yet, but
there is:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-negotiated-ff-dhe

I agree that implementations lacking this mechanism have a good reason
to avoid using finite field DH.

fwiw, i suspect we should also the term "finite field Diffie-Hellman
cipher suites" instead of "modular Diffie-Hellman cipher suites", since
elliptic curves are also modular.

        --dkg

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta

Reply via email to