On 2/11/15 2:26 PM, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet wrote:
On 2/11/15 1:21 PM, Pete Resnick wrote:
Looking through this rev, I only see three minor points brought up by
reviewers that don't appear (to me) to have been directly addressed:
- It was suggested that the document should updates RFC 5246 and RFC
6347.
Consider me convinced by Yaron's comment that this isn't an issue.
- At the end of 7.5, it wasn't clear what "foregoing" referred to.
That entire section - there is no (need for) certificate revocation in
DANE.
So probably best to s/The foregoing considerations/The consideration in
this section.
- It was suggested that an Informative/Normative references scrub take
place. (-prohibiting-rc4 was moved to Normative, but otherwise
everything else remained where it was.)
The authors didn't see a need to move any other references.
Consider me again convinced.
I'm comfortable putting this on the IESG agenda in its current form, and
can simply note these items in my ballot. If the editors or the shepherd
wish me to hold off, let me know in the next 24 hours.
As you wish. :-)
Given that the only thing left is the editorial bit in 7.5, I will push
the button. Thanks for your input.
pr
--
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
