On 03/06/2015 08:50 PM, John Mattsson wrote:
> There is an ongoing discussion in CDNi on how to define a TLS profile for all
> the CDNi interfaces. The suggestion from the CDNi chair is:
>
> “The general TLS usage guidance in [I-D.ietf-uta-tls-bcp] SHOULD be followed.”
>
> I have commented that the aim of the TLS BCP is “improving the security of
> deployed services” and that it alone is unnecessarily weak for a new
> standard. I suggested:
>
> “The general TLS usage guidance in [I-D.draft-ietf-httpbis-http2, Section
> 9.2] MUST be followed.”
>
> I think “How to define a TLS profile for a new standard?” is a question that
> many other groups will have in the future. Guidance from UTA would be good.
a stupid question: does CDNi mandate http2 ?
Cheers Leif
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
