Thanks, Aaron. Actually, I am not sure that we are looking at the right document yet. draft-ietf-uta-email-deep-01 was posted just before the last IETF. We have been waiting for the authors to post an updated version incorporating the feedback from that session and then call for the review.
Chris, Keith, Have I missed something? Where do you stand on this? Thanks, Orit. > -----Original Message----- > From: Uta [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Leif Johansson > Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 8:13 PM > To: Aaron Zauner <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Uta] draft-ietf-uta-email-deep-01 is ready for WGLC > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 2015-11-03 10:43, Aaron Zauner wrote: > > * Leif Johansson <[email protected]> [03/11/2015 02:03:16] wrote: > >> Embarrassingly we are at IETF95 and none of the reviews promised > >> at IETF94 are in hand... The notes from IETF94 lists 4 names > >> volunteering to review DEEP... > > > > I was one of them. Sorry, I completely forgot to write to list > > about this. I've read the draft a couple of times over the summer, > > I think it's ready for WGLC. This document is rather imporant in > > the context of e-mail security, so let's get this done. > > > > Aaron > > > > Thx Aron! > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > iEYEARECAAYFAlY5hbQACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZnfV5ACgxlvv+vnF3e4J7Hms98QTWX > pw > V5AAoKYgXIRYwUgbMqe5HhTwKYGy6GgW > =Puez > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > Uta mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
