Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 20, 2015, at 7:53 AM, Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hiya,
> 
> Sorry for being slow getting this done. My AD review of this
> is below. Please consider my comments as last call comments.
> I have requested last call for this one so you should see the
> announcement of that shortly.
> 
> - section 3, first list, bullet 1: what's option (c) there mean?
> wasn't clear to me.
> 
> - typo: "an email server certificates"
> 
> - section 3, 2nd list, bullet 3 - is that MUST NOT really needed? if
> URIs are not used, might it be better to be silent? (In case someone
> does figure out a use?)
> 
> - section 3, 2nd list, bullet 4 - afaik, CN is what is mostly
> actually used.  Shouldn't we recognise that reality with more than a
> MAY? It's been more than a decade since PKI folks started to want to
> not use CN and that's just not worked. (Or am I wrong and CAs/MUAs
> are finally seeing CN not used?)

Hmm, they were used in all of the CAs I set up and certificates I have needed 
to use, adding the host name there.  Sometimes there were CNAMEs added in an 
extension.  What are you seeing used instead of CN/DN?
> 
> - section 4, bullets 1&2 - do we have any evidence that these MUSTs
> will be honoured? If not, or if we have eveidence that they will be
> ignored, then is it really a good idea to include such RFC6919-isms?
> (A change here would also percolate to sections 3 and 5 I guess.)
> 
> - I think the answer is "no," but I'll ask anyway:-) Many mail
> service providers use names like mail.example.com, smtp.example.com,
> imap.example.com etc. Would it be useful for this document to
> encourge the use of specific hostname parts for specific functions?
> (Hostname part is probably the wron term, I mean the smtp, imap,
> mail parts of those names)
> 
> Cheers,
> S.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Uta mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta

_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta

Reply via email to