Hi Leif,
What would you recommend to refresh RFC 4642 so that it can be
consistent with the latest published RFCs about TLS and its best practices?
UTA could definitely be the right place for this work. In Yokohama last
week Orit stood up at the mic in SAAG to ask for those able and willing
to turn up and help out with this.
Thanks for your details about what happened in Yokohama. I'm also
grateful to Orit for having asked.
My suggestion is that you publish an individual submission with the
updates to NNTP and other language around TLS in NNTP you and the
NNTP community consider appropriate and then we'll just have to see
if there is enough traction in the UTA wg to take this on as a WG
item.
That sounds good. I'll have a look at it in the first few months of
2016, and propose the draft to the UTA WG.
I would also suggest that if you or others have contacts in the NNTP
community then please ask them to gather on this list and volunteer
to work on this. This would significantly increase the chance that
UTA will be successful in taking this work on.
Sure. I know a few active people in the NNTP community that should be
interested in reviewing the draft and participating to subsequent
discussion.
Have a nice week,
--
Julien ÉLIE
« Aequum est ut cuius participauit lucrum, participet et damnun. »
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
