On May 10, 2016 at 13:06:12 , Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:56:54PM -0700, Daniel Margolis wrote:
>
> > Agreed; makes sense to me. I'm not sure if it makes sense to extend the
> > DEEP-specific reporting to cover this case; it may be easier to just draft
> > a short separate spec on this. What do you think?
>
> Yes, I think the alignment is only in spirit, there are major
> differences in the flesh. So a separate spec seems the right way
> at the moment.
Submission and SMTP relay are syntax-aligned but not semantics aligned. I
object to deviation from that design. So there should be only one syntax for
in-band SMTP reporting, but exactly what is reported will vary based on whether
it is the submission or relay use case. If someone wants to write a separate
spec for this, I am fine removing the present syntax from MUA STS and
suggesting submission-relevant text for the separate spec.
- Chris
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
