> On May 14, 2016, at 2:30 AM, Gihan Dias <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Is it an *atypical* DNS name, or an *invalid* DNS name?
It is completely valid, just not a valid hostname. DNS supports
arbitrary binary data in record owner labels. In any case, since
this does not do what the OP wanted from it, further dissection of
this is moot. I should have followed up with a technically correct,
but irrelevant correction. Sorry about that.
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
