Please post a revised draft with these changes sooner rather than later. Thanks.
Ned > Sounds like we go back to underscore-prefixed. Thanks for the feedback > John. > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 5:55 AM, John Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote: > > In article <813df83a-841e-4e6a-e3a1-f2852b20d...@bluepopcorn.net> you > > write: > > >3.1. MTA-STS TXT records > > > > > >There is no IANA registry for reserved hostnames, which is why protocols > > >like SPF store their policies at the domain itself. > > > > Urrgh. SPF is as far as I know the only protocol published by the > > IETF that stores policies at the unprefixed hostname, and that is > > widely agreed to be a mistake. DKIM and DMARC use prefixes. > > > > There's the somewhat separate issue that if the prefixed name has to > > be a hostname so it can be used in a URI, it can't contain an > > underscore. > > > > R's, > > John > > > > PS: Dave Crocker and I have been working on a prefix registry, but > > it's a thankless task. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Uta mailing list > > Uta@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta > > _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta