> On Jun 28, 2017, at 6:54 PM, Stephen Farrell <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> While I understand and sympathise with Viktor's argument
> for kv, I don't think that argument ought be blocking as
> the differences seem to me to mostly relate to the sets
> of libraries already linked to mta implementations, which
> doesn't seem to me like a winning argument, as ymmv.
The point is not so much about this or that library, but about
needless complexity and bloat. JSON, XML, ASN.1, ... are much
too general and complex for the task at hand.
Good engineering is about making things as simple as possible
(and no simpler), and JSON fails the test. It is, and remains,
entirely unnecessary for STS.
BTW, I did suggest a few candidate KV encodings upthread.
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
