>>>>> "DM" == Daniel Margolis <[email protected]> writes:
DM> Of course, per the TLSRPT specification, if there's no TLSRPT RR, there's DM> no reporting. ;) DM> Granted, it may be isn't quite as explicit as it should be. Do you think we DM> need to call that out (i.e. "if senders and recipients both implement DM> TLSRPT")? Yes, that was my point. This doc should be explicit in that case. There a lots of ways to word it, your quote above works. -JimC -- James Cloos <[email protected]> OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6 _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
