Additionally, I've just noticed that the rua field in TLSRPT is unlike
DMARC, and is a single URL, not a comma-separated list. In my experience
deploying DMARC, it's been useful to feed reports to multiple systems. If
that's an oversight, rather than an explicit decision, I'd be keen on
TLSRPT matching DMARC, and supporting a list.
Cheers,
David

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 9:15 AM, David Illsley <[email protected]>
wrote:

> A couple of minor comments:
> 1. Section 3 includes:
>   "A URI specifying the endpoint to which aggregate information about
> policy failures should be sent" and "When sending failure reports via SMTP"
> This might imply that reports should only be sent when a failure is
> experienced, whereas I believe the intention is for this to be like DMARC
> where reporting is sent when messages are exchanged even if there are no
> policy failures.
> This could be clarified with the above changed to:
>  "A URI specifying the endpoint to which aggregate information about
> policy validation results should be sent" and "When sending aggregate
> reports via SMTP"
>
> 2. Appendix 2: Example JSON Report - the JSON has a few syntax problems:
>  - A , is required after the "summary" object
>  - A " is required to close the result-type property in the third failure
>  - A " is required to close the receiving-mx-hostname in the third failure
>
> HTH
> David
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Brotman, Alexander <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hello Folks,
>>
>> We attempted to incorporate the feedback from Alexey and Chris as best we
>> could, and we believe we have addressed each of their concerns either via
>> the updated draft or via the mailing list.  The period for the WGLC is
>> nearly over, and we wanted to try to provide an interim/updated draft for
>> any final review.  Thank you for any comments.
>>
>> --
>> Alex Brotman
>> Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse
>> Comcast
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Uta mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta

Reply via email to