Hi Benjamin,
Thank you for your review comments!
Just a generic reply on one of them:
On 16/04/2018 16:22, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
Section 3
o "v": This value MUST be equal to "TLSRPTv1".
How about something like "This document defines version 1; other
versions may be defined in later documents"? Additionally, text
later in this section aboud discarding records that do not begin
with "v=TLSRPTv1;" and the pruned list not having exactly one
element is not friendly to future version negotiation.
On a more meta level, do we really need both versioning and extensions?
Extensions are optional to understand, while a new version would force
the recipient to understand it. So for example if one wants to make a
particular extension mandatory to process, the version number needs to
be incremented.
I am not making any claims about how likely any of these are.
Best Regards,
Alexey
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
