On 4/17/18 9:25 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > >> On Apr 17, 2018, at 11:22 AM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> During ART-ART and IESG review of draft-ietf-tram-stunbis, we realized >> that just pointing to RFC 7525 might not be enough anymore, now that the >> TLS 1.3 spec has been approved for publication. 7525bis, anyone? > > Is TLS 1.3 already best-practice? It might take some time before all > the early interoperability and deployment barriers are shaken out...
Deployment is happening quite quickly. I agree on smoothing out any kinks (and DTLS 1.3 is still under development), but we might want to provide recommendations about cipher suites as soon as practicable. And note that we started work on the Internet-Draft that became RFC 7525 over 18 months before publication. Hopefully it will not take us as long this time. Anyway, it's something for this group to keep an eye on and likely revisit before the end of the year if not sooner. Peter
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
