Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts-17: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Edit: Could the format of the _mta-sts to be something like: "_mta-sts.example.com. TXT "v=STSv2; id=20180114T070707; label=foo" ? This would mean that the policy can be fetched from foo.example.com - the record *could* specify "label=mta-sts" if it wanted - this allows this to work without "reserving" a DNS label. ] I apologize, this DISCUSS written in a rush. I'm uncomfortable with the DNS "reservations" happening in this document -- it basically reserves the (leftmost) DNS labels _mta-sts (as a TXT record) and mta-sts as a hard-coded name -- I think that this needs to be better documented / in the IANA considerations. I apologize for the lack of detail/lack of actionable content - I couldn't decide between Deferring and balloting DISCUSS -- I decided on DISCUSS because I think I need to think about this, and clearing a DISCUSS is simpler than having the document stuck for a full cycle. _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
