>>>>> "BA" == Brotman, Alexander <[email protected]> writes:
BA> We have just uploaded a new revision for each of the above drafts.
You added this text;
id> Note that in all such cases, the policy endpoint ("https://mta-
id> sts.user.example/.well-known/mta-sts.txt" in this example) must still
id> present a certificate valid for the Policy Domain ("user.example"),
id> and not for that of the provider ("provider.example").
Should that be "mta-sts.user.example" vs "mta-sts.provider.example"?
As is, it gives the impression that the policy host ought to provide a
cert for the policy domain rather than for itself.
-JimC
--
James Cloos <[email protected]> OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
