Hi Richard,

> On 5 Sep 2018, at 10:49, Richard Gray <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Is there a typo in the formal definition of an MTA-STS policy in 
> draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts-21 section 3.2?
> 
> Specifically, sts-policy-mx is not referenced from anywhere else in the ABNF 
> definition. It seems that this was referenced by sts-policy-field in version 
> 20 of the draft, but went missing in version 21. The identifiers 
> sts-policy-mx-label and sts-policy-mx-toplabel also seem to be "orphaned" in 
> this way.
You are correct. There were a few more typos found, which should be fixed 
before the final RFC is published.

I recorded some of the issues found so far at 
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts/writeup/>

Best Regards,
Alexey
> 
> Regards,
> -- 
> Richard Gray | Operations Technical Lead 
> DDI: +64 9 950 2196 Fax: +64 9 302 0518 
> Mobile: +64 21 050 8178 Freephone:0800 SMX SMX (769 769) 
> SMX Limited: Level 10, 19 Victoria Street West, Auckland, New Zealand 
> Web: http://smxemail.com 
> 
> 
> This email has been filtered by SMX. For more information visit smxemail.com.
> _______________________________________________
> Uta mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta

Reply via email to