Hi Jim,
please, publish an updated version of the draft. I found no more issues.
Regards,
Valery.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Fenton
Date: 4 декабря 2018 г. 19:31
To: Alexey Melnikov ; Valery Smyslov ; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Uta] Wrapping up draft-ietf-uta-smtp-require-tls-05
OK; shall I do an update or wait for more comments?
-Jim
On 12/4/18 7:11 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
Hi Valery,
On 04/12/2018 15:00, Valery Smyslov wrote:
Hi,
while preparing shepherd write-up for the draft I came across
one issue. IANA Considerations section contains the following text:
If published as an RFC, this draft requests the addition of an entry
to the Permanent Message Header Field Names Registry
[PermMessageHeaderFields]:
Header field name: RequireTLS
Applicable protocol: mail
Status: provisional
Author/change controller: IETF UTA Working Group
Specification document: (this document)
I'm not familiar with Message Header Field Names Registry,
but it seems to me that this request is wrong. In particular,
according to RFC 3864 the status for the Permanent Fields must be one of
"standard", "experimental", "informational", "historic", "obsoleted",
etc.,
but not "provisional", which is only appropriate for the
Provisional Message Header Fields. I think that in this case
it must be "standard", since the draft is Standards Track document.
I agree.
In addition, the Change controller must be just "IETF"
(again, according to RFC 3864).
Yes.
Am I missing something?
And note also a small typo in Section 2:
s/succesfully/successfully
Regards,
Valery.
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
