> On Jan 5, 2019, at 10:50 AM, Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> I have a proposal for SMTPS (Implicit TLS), port 25 secure alternative on a 
> new dedicated port 26.
> 
> Both MTA-STS and MTA-DANE tries to fix the STARTTLS downgrade issue. However 
> the implementation is not simple. The former requires a HTTPS server and the 
> latter requires DNSSEC. 
> 
> I'm proposing a very simple solution. It's actually dead simple. So i'm not 
> really sure whether it was proposed before and got rejected for some reasons 
> or you guys really missed that one.

This adds complexity, without solving any problems.  I'm afraid
this proposal has no merit.

*  The attacker can just as easily block connections to port 26,
   as filter out STARTTLS.

*  This in no way addresses the authentication issues.

There are more problems, but those two are enough to make further
discussion of the proposal pointless.

-- 
        Viktor.

_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta

Reply via email to