> > AFAIK, the relevant Let's Encrypt limits are: > That might be right, it might not.
It's the value they document. Here's a link: https://letsencrypt.org/docs/rate-limits/ I also note that I missed the point that this limit only applies on creation, not renewal. So it doesn't look like it it's even relevant. > Making deployment policies based on soft guidelines is probably not going to > scale well. Let me guess - you haven't operated a high end messaging system recently that sends lot of mail, have you? Because if you had, you'd know that setting deployment policies based not just on completely squishy guidelines, but based on constantly changing operational data is an absolute requirement. Compared to other stuff the rules for using Let's Encrypt might as well be chiseled in stone. > Yes, if we made everyone use TLS for all inter-node transport, things would > be better. But we can't. Next! Of course we can't. But I fail to see what that has to do with the scalability of MTA STS. Ned _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
