> On Jan 15, 2019, at 5:21 PM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie>
> wrote:
>
> Well, not until you get to ESNI and fingerprinting different
> handshake instances as a way to track a message down a chain
> of MTAs.
This is mail, not HTTP. If you get to read the resulting
headers, the trace headers are all there. So whatever your
concern was, it seems rather moot.
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
Uta@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
- Re: [Uta] how to log, was flake ho, was M... Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [Uta] how to log, was flake ho, was M... John Levine
- Re: [Uta] how to log, was flake ho, was MTA-STS with l... Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [Uta] how to log, was flake ho, was MTA-STS w... John Levine
- Re: [Uta] how to log, was flake ho, was MTA-S... Jeremy Harris
- Re: [Uta] how to log, was flake ho, was M... John Levine
- [Uta] More TLS bits to record? Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [Uta] More TLS bits to record? Christian Huitema
- Re: [Uta] More TLS bits to record? Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [Uta] More TLS bits to record? Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Uta] More TLS bits to record? Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [Uta] More TLS bits to record? Daniel Kahn Gillmor
