Hi Russ, On 1/26/19 7:27 AM, Russ Housley wrote: > I have no problem with the protocol itself, but I do not understand how this > specification can not have a reference to TLS.
It does have at least a couple of indirect references to TLS, through STARTTLS (RFC 3207) and BCP 195. An informative reference to TLS could be added, but I'm not sure it adds much -- this is operating at a level of abstraction above that. -Jim _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
